These days if you find Goths in Rome they are likely to be nihilistic teenagers with pale skin, dressed head to toe in black. If they seem over emotional they may be emos rather than goths. Tribes of teenagers sacking the city of Rome may seem absurd but in ancient days the Gothic armies were probably heavily manned by teenage warriors.
The first and most famous invasion was the “Sack of Rome” by the Visigoths under Alaric. When people speak of “Barbarians at the Gates” it is a direct reference to the Sack in 410 AD. Not the first sack of Rome, but the first since the attack by the Gauls under Brennus some 800 years earlier.
Once breached Rome fell prey to many new opportunists. The Vandals carried off any portable wealth that the Visigoths left when, led by Genseric, they sacked the city 455 AD.
The Goths rounded off the “4 Sacks of Ancient Rome” in 546 AD when the Ostrogoths under Totila sacked the city.
The Ostrogoths also tried in 537 AD when Belisarius occupied the City in his reconquest of Italy for Emperor Justinian. Belisarius was Justinian’s favourite general, victor over the Persians at the battle of Dara, victor of the Vandals, the man who saved Constantinople from the Nike riots, when the people of new Rome rioted because of the shortage of good running shoes. OK, maybe that’s a lie. The Greek for victory is Nika, from the Goddess of victory, Nike. The password for the rioters was the word they shouted at the chariot races, so they were the Nika riots (victory riots). When Phil Knight decided to make running shoes he decided to call them after the Greek Goddess of Victory, and as a point of information the final e in Nike is pronounced as it is in all Greek female names such as Phoebe, Penelope, Ariadne and Chloe.
It was on this day in 537 that the Siege of Rome by the Ostrogoths began. There was no Ostrogothic sack of Rome in 537, which kind of gives a hint to how the siege will end. Strangely enough I am currently reading Robert Graves “Count Belisarius” and by coincidence I reached the Siege of Rome on exactly the anniversary of the Siege of Rome.
As a novel Count Belisarius is not a patch on I Claudius which is a masterpiece. The account of Belisarius reads far more like a history book than a novel. Unlike with Claudius the author fails to bring the characters to life as living breathing people. It is an interesting and very accurate account of events, but it struggles as a novel.