Pilénai

February 25th is the anniversary of the 1336AD mass suicide at Pilénai, a hill fort in Lithuania, where 4,000 brave defenders took their own lives rather than surrender to the Teutonic Knights. Balderdash! But let me explain why.

When you mention the Crusades most people default to Outremer, the Holy Land, where the Templar and Hospitaller orders maintained a strong presence. But there were other Crusades and other orders. Spain had the reconquista and the Knights of Calatrava and it was accorded the same conditions by the Pope as service in Jerusalem. You could win indulgences, shrive yourself of sins, and even clear your debts. The siege of Lisbon in Portugal was one of the few Christian victories of the second crusade. In Germany the Teutonic Order secured crusader terms and conditions for their conversion (at the point of a sword) of the pagan peoples of the region that now constitutes Prussia/Poland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.

It is called the Northern Crusades, and ran from the Wendish Crusade in 1147 until it fizzled out in the early 15th Century as it dawned on the religious leaders that the Catholic/Roman Christians such as the Teutonic and Livonian orders were fighting Orthodox Russian Christians of the church in Constantinople rather than pagans. The “crusades” had become a massive land grab as the Germans and Russians grasped their opportunities to expand into the region. Further North the Swedes saw the way the wind was blowing and conquered large sections of what is now Finland. The Northern Crusades gave way to the Northern Wars between Prussia, Denmark, Poland, Lithuania, Sweden and Russia.

In most of Europe war is a summertime affair. Grass is the fuel for horses and large cavalry armies were only able to campaign when the grass was plentiful. Snow and ice in the winter made it difficult to move and most armies hunkered down in the cold of winter. Spring and autumn rains turned roadways into a sea of mud, and farmers were needed for spring planting and autumn harvest, so wars were fought in summer.

War in the Baltic states was a bit different. The Romans never stretched their influence into these lands so they were devoid of straight roads. Moving about was difficult in the Summertime. Strangely enough it was the winter when travel was easiest. The many lakes, rivers and streams of the baltic region freeze solid in winter. In the process they become flat highways that facilitate travel by a cavalry army as long as you have crampons on your horseshoes.

So it was in February of 1336 in the winter campaign season when the Teutonic order moved in force against the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. When the powerful Teutonic army was spotted the people of the region fled to the hillfort at Pilénai. The Duke, Margiris, attempted to rally his forces but he was quickly over-run. It is at this stage the legend becomes divorced from reality.

The legend is that the stout hearted Lithuanians, seeing they had no hope, bravely committed mass suicide, thus denying the hated Germans booty or slaves. This is a founding legend of the Lithuanian people. There is nothing like a great massacre or sacrifice to build national pride. The Jews did it at Masada. In India the British gifted them the Amritsar massacre. Ireland has two Bloody Sundays, one in Dublin in 1921 and one in Derry in 1972.

I say the legend of Pilénai is balderdash because it was not Jonestown in Guyana where Jim Jones calmly lined up his followers and dispensed cyanide in Koolaid. Pilénai was undoubtedly a scene of chaos. Frightened peasants scrambling up the hill from all sides pursued by the Teutonic soldiers. When they saw the scene anyone with a horse tried to escape. Margiris attempted to establish a cordon but the attacking troops hurled stones and flaming brands into the defensive lines.

Instead of the defenders deciding to burn their property to deny it to the attackers the fires were probably started by the attackers. The defenders may have thrown the peasants belongings into fires as a means of keeping the Teutonics at bay. What we know is that many peasants and very few soldiers found themselves trapped by a powerful German army on a hillfort from which they could not escape. The peasants came from four different regions and were in no way a united people. Some may have committed suicide. Some died defending the hill. Some were captured and taken prisoner.

But that will not do for a national legend. The 4,000 men, women and children were transformed into 4,000 brave Lithuanian soldiers. The chaos was transformed into resolve and decision. The agency for the victory was stripped from the Teutonic knights and the Lithuanians were celebrated for their sacrifice. This is how legends are born.

The nationalist Irish song below, written in 1844 evokes the suicidal defense of Thermopylae by the 300 Spartans, and the three Romans who defended the Pons Sublicius; Spurius Lartius, Titus Herminius and Horatius Cocles. It conjures up the old pagan belief that an act of human sacrifice can win the favour of the Gods.

A Nation once again; by Thomas Osborne Davis

When boyhood’s fire was in my blood
I read of ancient freemen.
For Greece and Rome who bravely stood,
three hundred men and three men.
And there I prayed I yet might see
our fetters rent in twain
and Ireland, long a province be
a nation once again.

It whisper’d too, that freedom’s ark
and service high and holy
would be prepared by feelings dark
and passion vain or lowly.
For freedom comes from God’s right hand
and needs a godly train
and righteous men must make our land
a nation once again.

So as I grew from boy to man
I bent me to that bidding.
My spirit of each selfish plan
and cruel passion ridding.
For thus I hoped some day to aid
oh, can such hope be vain
when my dear country should be made
a nation once again.

A nation once again,
a nation once again,
and Ireland, long a province be
a nation once again!

-=o0o=-

This site is available for free and I make no money from any ads you see here. If you would like to show your appreciation feel free to leave a comment or you can buy me a coffee! http://buymeacoffee.com/DonalClancy

Golden Bridge

Camerone

Last stand of the Foreign Legion at Camerone (Jean Adolphe Beauce)

To win an argument give your opponent a line of retreat.

If you spend any time on social media you will have encountered the phenomenon where arguments descend into insults with one party calling the other a fascist, or a communist, or Hitler, or Stalin etc.

Godwin’s Lawas an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1

We frequently see situations where the parties involved fail to convey their well thought-out arguments, and the positions become further polarised.  Instead of thesis meeting antithesis and forming synthesis you see thesis meet antithesis and the two sides dig in.

Then Kokko’s law is invoked.  The person with the largest number of followers “wins” the argument simply by swamping the opposition with insults.

Kokko’s LawLacking the intelligence or the education to argue positions effectively extremists of all persuasions roam the internet in packs drowning out dissent with volume for want of wit.

I have come to realise that argument has almost nothing in common with battle strategy.  In battle we don’t try to convince the other side of the validity of our position.  Battle is far beyond that stage.  Battle is an attempt to win the argument by wiping the enemy off the field.  Battle strategies largely focus on complete annihilation of the enemy.  This usually involves full encirclement so they have no means of escape.

Some of the greatest and most heroic battles in history involved the last stand of men who would not surrender.  Leonidas and his 300 Spartans at Thermopylae, Andries Pretorius’ voortrekkers at the Battle of Blood River, the Royal Engineers at Rorke’s Drift, Captain Jean Danjou and the French Foreign Legion at Camerone, General Custer and the battle of the Little Big Horn.  Win or lose they are battles famous for last stands against terrible odds.

Sun Tzu would see such battles as a failure of planning.  The great military strategist knew that a rat will run if it has an escape route but a rat in a trap will turn and fight.  Sun Tzu said you should “Build your opponent a golden bridge to retreat across“.

In a last stand situation you provide your opponent with an advantage.  One of the great problems for military commanders is motivating people to fight.  Even hardened veterans will opt for an escape if one materialises.  If you encircle your enemy you convert all these potential runners into fighters.

By providing a “Golden Bridge” you undermine the determination and unity of your enemy.  Now some will want to stand and fight, but many more will opt to “run away and live to fight another day“.

What does this have to do with winning arguments on Twitter?

If you try to win an argument on social media – give your “opponent” a golden bridge.  They approach the argument with a fully constructed and working weltanschauung. If your argument destroys the foundations of their view of the world they cannot accept it.  They will become the 300 Spartans.  They dig in and fight for their belief of how the world works.

More importantly you will (as per Kokko’s Law) attract in others with that world view who will support your opponent, and block them from considering your arguments.

But if you provide them with a golden bridge, a means to resolve their current weltanschauung with the new position that you have provided then they will be more open to adopting some part of your argument.  Some of their supporters will also question their positions.

They can save face, retreat to a new position, and you can begin the next battle.  Instead of the Battle of Thermopylae it follows the pattern of the Overland Campaign in the U.S. Civil War.  General Grant moved to flank Lee who would retreat, defend a position, only to be outflanked again.  But Grant did not attempt a single killer blow.  He made “argument” after “argument” but always provided a golden bridge for Lee to retreat.

Over time General Lee lost more and more of his “followers” and finally U.S. Grant was able to convince him to surrender.

OK if you have got this far please be aware my tongue is firmly in my cheek.  Twitter threads are not comparable to the Civil War.  But sometimes you should stop arguing before you win.  Let your opponent own the win and the point is made.  Seek the win and the point is lost.